Mr. Gay Pride: The Blog

This is a copy of a post to my political blog.

Bruce Jenner Is a Man, Rachel Dolezal Is White — and the Truth Will Out

I do not for an instant believe that Bruce Jenner truly believes that he is a woman. He is just playing some kind of demented game with reality, all the while he knows full well that it is not possible that he could have been 'born in the wrong body', have become an Olympic Gold Medalist in the MEN'S Decathlon, and have fathered SIX children if he had 'really' been a woman. It is not possible that he could have reached the age of 65 while maintaining an insane delusion. He CANNOT really believe he is a woman. So why does anyone on Earth treat HIM as a WOMAN?
+
Media that call Bruce Jenner a woman are guilty of a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY, and should be held to account. They are encouraging a lunatic to have himself surgically mutilated in a grotesque, irreversible operation. They are little better than the Nazi concentration-camp doctor Josef Mengele, who performed medically unnecessary surgeries upon prisoners that had no scientific basis. Mengele killed uncounted numbers of helpless people. The neo-Nazis of today's cheering section for mutilation of gender-confused lunatics have not as yet killed anyone, but it is decidedly true that if a loon who has himself castrated during a period of delusion should fall into profound depression over his terrible mistake, and what was done to him by people who should have known better, he might very well commit suicide. Indeed, I would be very surprised if NO post-operative "transgendered" "woman" has NOT killed himself. Perhaps people who find themselves in such a position should instead kill the people who castrated him, and others who first worked to induce him to have himself castrated and even more invasively and thoroughly mutilated by "doctors" unworthy of the name. That would shake things up, wouldn't it?.
+
When I heard all the clamor encouraging, indeed INCITING Bruce Jenner to have himself castrated, I was livid. As the man who in 1970 offered the term "Gay Pride" as it is now used, I knew the horrendous pressures that some of these men were subjected to, esp. in some ethnic and religious communities in which they were told that only a woman could properly have sex with a man, and which were willing to play an appalling game with reality whereby a castrated man could be accepted as a woman. I once had sex with a very cute gay man who was actually thinking of having "sex-change" surgery performed upon him, despite the MANifest fact that he was sexually very manly. How do people get so crazy? (I hope he did not go thru with such mutilation, and want to believe he came to his senses before he caused something awful to be done to him, but I did not keep in touch. Let's say he woke up in time.
+
Well, some people are just not intellectually rigorous nor psychologically tuf. They let themselves be twisted around other people's little finger, and bullied into things they should never permit but fite with every bit of strength they can bring to the battle. But they don't, because they defeat themselves in going over to the enemy — THEIR enemies — before they could even begin to fite. I have never understood people who allow themselves to be bullied. My father taught me never to put up with such crap, and my older brother Alan gave me good advice about how to fite back against a physical bully. Today. however, we hear of young people so utterly gutless and useless that they allow themselves to be "bullied" over the Internet, not even in person; by mere evanescent words, not even physical attack. How appallingly stupid some people are! That does not mean they deserve to be terrorized into having themselves castrated, or into killing themselves. But I learned decades ago that people who feel useless go out of their way to PROVE they are useless, and so buy into all the crap that others try to inflict on them. There's not much that people who feel worthless can do about their feelings of worthlessness. It is for outsiders, esp. but not just in helping professions, to slice thru their negativity, as THO with a scalpel, but not REALLY with a scalpel.
+
I have, for DECADES, been hugely indignant about the Castration Conspiracy that has worked to have gay men castrated and surgically camouflaged as to misrepresent them as 'women'
+
When I heard of this Bruce Jenner lunacy, and other media conspiracies in recent weeks, in several major media that one would have THOUGHT legitimate, I was so agitated and furious that I couldn't write straight, so had to put the issue aside while I considered what I could say without foaming at the mouth.
+
One of the points that I knew I needed to stress was, what other insane delusions would society foster? What, I most relevantly considered, would society think of someone who wanted to change his or her RACE? Would society be as understanding, and supportive? Would society urge people who wanted to be of a different race to have their skin stripped from every part of their body and replaced with skin more appropriate to another race? Would society encourage black people to slice off the scalp that produced offending "kinky" hair and replace it with straight hair? I had thought it likely that the typical self-despising loser who wanted to change his or her race would be a black person who was tired of being treated as a second-class citizen and consigned to a more difficult life because of residual racism — even tho, we must ALWAYS remember, the current President of the United States is black, and won TWO terms in office, so racism is actually more a problem within the mind of black people with a race problem than a problem of real disadvantages imposed upon blacks by whites, Latinos, and Orientals. A relative few very-lite-skinned black people have "passed" as white for well over a century. Without surgery.
+
Then, within the past few weeks, a race-change issue actually did arise —a veritable "godsend" for my case, tho of course I don't believe in God, because I'm not retarded — when a bizarre, self-denying white woman was exposed as misrepresenting herself as black! Once her deception was revealed, and one of her black adoptive brothers blew the lid wide open in telling media that she asked him to go along with her deception, she did not back down but upped the stakes and claimed to be "transracial", a clear misapproprration of that term, which theretofore had been used only to refer to adoption of a child of one race by a family of another race. Plainly, Ms. Dolezal (whose last name is apparently to be pronounced dóe.la.zhàal, tho I can't imagine in what language that would be the proper pronunciation; I know quite a lot about the sound systems of major European languages, and in NONE of them is Z pronounced as ZH) was trying to make herself sound 'legitimate', because we are supposed to accept that a "transgendered" person is legitimate and thus entitled to make the preposterous and disgraceful assertion that they are not what their genetics plainly say they are. But, you see, it's not what one IS, biologically! No, it's whatever one wants to BE that matters. So Ms. Dolezal is 100% Caucasian? So what? If she "identifies" as black, she IS black, right? Wrong.
+
Race is not optional. Gender is not optional. Species is not optional. And REALITY is not optional.
+
If someone says he is a werewolf, do we accept that? Or do we assume he is playing some stupid game with reality? Or that he is seriously insane if he really believes it?
+
What if someone asserts that he is a flying squirrel? Do we then surgically connect, permanently, one of those gliding suits that daredevils who do not value their life use to glide for long distances after jumping off a clifftop?
+
If someone claimed to be a refrigerator, would we install a little lite at the back of their throat that goes on every time he opens his mouth and off every time it closes?
+
How much ridiculous nonsense do we accept, and when do we say NO! NO MORE NONSENSE. NO MORE LIES, and then strip away all the shams, all the pretenses, all the delusions to force people to deal with REALITY?
+
Fortunately, society has partially redeemed itself in refusing to take Ms. Dolezal's lies seriously, but rejected them out of hand. Why won't society do that with Bruce Jenner's lies?
+
I'm actually a little surprised that Ms. Dolezal's scam has produced so little discussion of "passing" as a person of a different race. I have seen only one commentary, by "guest commentator" Carmelo Rivera in the Orlando Sentinel, which completely misses the mark and makes the contemptible assertion that everyone who abandons a narrow cultural or racial identity instead to participate in the Nation's melting pot is "passing". That laffable dopy column contains this prize drivel:

[Ms. Dolezal] transcended her white origins, as millions of Latinos and African-Americans and other Americans of other ethnicities have transcended their own cultures by becoming immersed in new behaviors and cultural traits.
+
What Dolezal did is an American phenomenon, and in so many ways, we are all passing and internalizing the American way.

That is not just ridiculous, but contemptible, idiotic dishonesty. No reputable publication should have published such off-the-wall-nuts nonsense. Ms. Dolezal did not "transcend" her "white origins". And she did not make a CULTURAL claim but a RACIAL claim. She LIED. And got caught. Mr. Rivera would have us believe that when a kid of Irish or German ancestry eats pizza or General Tso's chicken, he is "passing" for Italian or Chinese!
+
Gender (or perhaps we should, for the moment, write that Jennder) is not subject to change. It is intrinsic to the person, marked by a specific chromosomal configuration in each and every one of the billions of cells in his or her body. XX = female. XY = male. PERIOD. It doesn't matter whether you wear clothes intended for the opposite sex, or makeup, or long hair, or have surgery performed to lie to people. If your chromosomal configuration is XY, you are MALE. End of discussion. There are no "subtleties" or allowances to be made to what people WANT. You ARE what you ARE. Period.
+
"Transgendered" people are all LIARS, pure and simple. They know full well that they are NOT what they WISH they were, but what their chromosomes say they are. So when they demand that society "recognize" that their "reality" is nonbiological, society has the obligation to say NO! Sex is chromosomal, PERIOD. No ifs, ands, or buts. RACE is biological. You don't have the genetic markers for a particular race? Then you are NOT of that race. PERIOD.
+
Let's talk for a moment about lies being taken as truths, and a heterosexual man being dragged into a homosexual relationship against his will because he was fooled by a "transgendered" person who induced him to think that he was a "woman". How is that fair? "False advertising" doesn't cover it. A straight man who learns he has been having homosexual sex with a surgical "drag queen" can be permanently damaged, psychologically, not just by the experience but also by the feeling that a monster has made a FOOL of him. How readily can a man fooled in such a shocking way, recover? Frankly, I don't think there is a single jury in the Nation that would convict him if he KILLED that "transgendered" liar who humiliated him. I sure wouldn't vote to convict if I were on that jury.
+
Reality matters. Sanity matters. Honesty matters. Gender matters. And yes, even race matters, tho less by far than gender. People should be proud of who and what they are. That's why I offered the motto "Gay Pride", because it is important for gay men to be proud of being men who love men, want men, and want to spend time with men, and not just sexually. Gay men's manhood is always under assault, by simpleminded and intolerant people who need a translator. Yes, that's what they need, a translator that allows them to see other people's lives as being pretty much the same as theirs. Just as a speaker of English cannot make much sense from the speech and literature of, say, the Hispanic world, if it is translated into good English, they can immediately appreciate it.
+
Strip away all the anxiety around sexual orientation, and let straight people see gay people as, for almost all intents and purposes, exactly the same as they are, and everything will be fine. It won't be necessary for straight people to play moronic games in which cross-dressing, or surgical cross-dressing, is necessary to permit men to have intimate contact, even long-term love relationships with men. That in turn will allow "transgendered" men to accept that the reason they are attracted to men is that they are HOMOSEXUAL, not "women". Everything falls into place once a sexual-orientation-translator is put into operation.
+
Let us now return to the incredibly sad case of the terribly confused loser, Bruce Jenner, who said this, in an exchange with Diane Sawyer of ABC News:

"I am not gay. As far as I know, I am heterosexual. I've never been with a guy, I've always been married, raising kids."

But Sawyer pressed on, asking, "If you're assigned male and you become a female, but you like women, are you a lesbian?"

"You're going back to the sex thing and it's apples and oranges," Jenner responded. "Sexuality is who you're attracted to, but gender identity is about who you identify with."

"So much confusion," added Jenner.

Sawyer later said {via] voiceover that ABC News spoke to both ["]transgender["] people and experts who explained that "sexual desire and gender are two different things."

"Right now," says Jenner, "let's just say I'm asexual."

"There’s two different things here," Jenner explained. “Sexuality is who you personally are attracted to — who turns you on — male or female. But gender identity has to do with who you are as a person and your soul, and who you identify with inside.

"So much confusion"? For you, maybe, you stupid, stupid loser. So much BULLSH* is what it really comes down to for everyone who is NOT a stupid, stupid loser and liar. NONE of this insane confusion would exist if it were not directly tied into sexual desire. No other force could impel people to confusion about what they are and what they want. It IS all about sex, and to deny it persuades NO ONE. Bruce Jenner wants men, DESPERATELY. HOW he wants to TAKE men, sexually, is of less consequence than the simple reality that he wants to be craved, desired, wanted, TAKEN by men. NOTHING but sexual desire could overwhelm his sense of reality. NOTHING. There is NOTHING unique about Bruce Jenner's sexual desires. Hundreds of millions of men all around this planet want sex with men. Given the right to do so, ALL of them WILL have sex with men,and LOVE IT. Essentially all "straight" men know that there IS some man out there somewhere, that they would gladly have sex with. It is because legal and religious authorities KNOW that EVERY man could happily have sex with another man that they are so defensive and adamant that it must never happen. The hitcom Everybody Loves Raymond even devoted much of an episode to Raymond's having a powerful sexual reaction to a FedEx (or similar) deliveryman. As a gay man, I definitely share the producers' suspicions that EVERY man could be happy in a sexual encounter with another man. It wouldn't have to be an ongoing relationship. Just once might do, for each man they are (literally) irresistibly drawn to. But of course heterosexual society will not test that hypothesis, because if it turns out to be correct, society will not know what to do.
+
Bruce Jenner needs to be put out of his misery. More to the point, he needs to be put out of OUR misery, the confusion foisted upon us by irresponsible media who know full well that there is no such thing as a "transgendered" person but that, for reasons beyond my comprehension — after all, I'm only an IQ-certified genius; how could I possibly understand anything? — media insist on pretending exist. WHY? I really don't understand. And if a genius cannot understand, how can anyone else? You can't understand insanity, and that's all there is to it.
+
Is it some kind of misguided sympathy, in which instead of helping people cope with reality, media deny reality to accommodate them? Let's make a comparison to death. Should media, in dealing with people who have just experienced the loss of someone close to them — say, the nine people murdered in the Charleston massacre earlier this week — tell the people they seek to comfort that the people they lost are still alive? Of COURSE not. You don't LIE about reality. You help people COPE with reality. That is what decent people do.
+
The media of the United States are not decent. The fact that "the usual suspects" in Radical Right propaganda have been absolutely silent and accepting of the Transgender Lie shows that rhetorically, psychologically, and surgically castrating gay men is congenial to the worst people in this country. So while Left-leaning media may think they are being supportive and sympathetic to gender-confused gay people, what they are really doing is enlisting in the Castration Conspiracy in which the Radical Right is an extremely active participant.
+
Altho "bleeding-heart" Liberals may think, "OK, we know full well that there is no such thing as a 'transgendered' person, but that everyone's gender is marked by an unalterable chromosomal configuration, and the only way there could BE a sex-change is if the chromosomes in every single cell of a person's body were to change. But where's the harm in speaking softly and reassuringly to gender-confused people? Don't they have a hard enuf life that we shouldn't demand they face reality, but play into their delusion?"
+
Where's the harm? HERE: brutal, drastic, monstrous surgical mutilation that slices off a man's external genitalia and slashes a slit in his crotch, then pumps him full of hormones that, for being inappropriate to his body, can produce LETHAL CANCER. And if the gender-confused person wakes up AFTER such appalling surgery and realizes it was all a crazy DREAM — nitemare — it's too late, and cannot be undone. THAT'S where the harm is, for the people worst affected.
+
But there is lots of less-direct and less-catastrophic harm too, in telling little boys who are just beginning to realize that they want to be close, for the rest of their lives, to boys and then men, not to girls and then women, and thus leading them to think that there is something WRONG with them, because Nature permits only heterosexuality, so if they want a boy or man, they are NOT a boy or man themselves, but must have themselves "fixed", by psychotherapy, hormone injections, or "sex-reassignment" surgery. THAT'S where the harm is.
+
Bruce Jenner is telling everyone on planet Earth that a man is a woman; that gender is optional; and that if you find yourself to be of "the wrong gender", you should have yourself "fixed". Bruce Jenner is an enemy of humanity, and should be treated as such.
+
There is nothing humane nor decent nor fair about allowing people who commit crimes against humanity to get away with them.
+
What is most appalling about all the rallying to Bruce Jenner is that so many people call him "courageous" for going public with his confusions. No, there is NOTHING courageous about giving in to madness rather than fiting for sanity. Facing realities that make you unhappy is courageous. Denying reality is cowardice. Would society praise Bruce Jenner if he were to tell the world that death is a lie, and anyone who wants to live forever need merely resolve not to die, and they will live forever? What if he were to say that you can smoke 12 packs of cigarets a day and not suffer any health consequences? Would that be courageous? No.
+
What would be courageous of Bruce Jenner is to admit that he cannot cope with reality, but needs professional help, and then SEEK professional help. Tell people that no matter how troubled you are, there are people who want to help, and might actually be able to help. Don't cave in to delusions but fite for sanity. Accept reality and find ways to adjust to it.
+
Bruce Jenner — there is no such person as "Caitlyn Jenner" — needs to be put out of his misery. Perhaps powerful prescription drugs can break thru his delusion castle. Perhaps electroshock therapy can zap him sane. Perhaps brain surgery, such as a lobotomy, can "fix" him. Or perhaps he is too far gone, and must be encouraged to kill himself. If the death of one enemy of society will wake SOCIETY up, that is a very, very small price to pay.
+
Life is temporary, NOT permanent. If Bruce Jenner is miserable and unable to accept reality, he can take the "Final Exit" that will end his misery. Other societies, less "civilized" than ours, might take care of that for him, in order to save other people from the monstrous and agonizing confusions that Bruce Jenner promotes. Why would someone as appallingly unhappy as Bruce Jenner want to continue to live? He and everyone in media who are promoting gender madness should be punished. I repeat: life is temporary. Egregious crimes against humanity warrant egregious punishments. Bye-BYE!

For decades, my enemies in the "lesbigay" Movement have tried to deny me credit for coining the term "Gay Pride" as it is now used. They have just been dealt a severe setback: a British podcast about language issues recognizes my role without reservation. Will Wikipedia finally surrender to the truth, or will cowardly liars hide behind anonymity to continue to deny credit where credit is due?



The podcast is "The Allusionist". The particular episode is #12: "Pride", which was placed on the Internet on June 3d and remains current until two weeks from the 3d, the 17th. Even after that, if you scroll down at the podcast's website, you should be able to listen to #12, which is about 18 minutes long. I speak during about 13 of those minutes. The sound is a little garbled at times because we were conversing on a trans-Atlantic fone call.



Documentary proof of my role can be seen at the Second Anniversary Special Issue of the newsletter of the organization Homosexuals Intransigent!, April-May 1971: a scan of a paragraf from that mimeograffed publication that can be found in gay archives in various universities and standalone gay archives. If I can find time to alter the HTML code on that page to allow a link directly to that graffic, I will do so. But considering how backed-up I am in my various computer tasks, this must wait. If you'd like to see that scanned paragraf online, in context, just use your vertical scrollbar to go about 40% down the page and look for a paragraf of text on a white background in a lavender-bordered box. For your convenience, I show a screen capture of that area below.



Who, you might wonder, are the "enemies" who want to deny me credit for what I obviously did do? "Enemies" is a strong word, but it fits this situation. At different times, I as a gay activist and writer/"propagandist" have had various enemies. Early on, they included Communist-influenced people in organizations with names like "Gay Liberation Front", because I knew well and stated aloud that Communists were not our friends, but sought only to use gay people to promote internal conflict in the United States, to weaken this country as part of the drive to carry out worldwide Communist Revolution. I had no hesitancy to point out that Communist Cuba had an internment camp for gay men on the Isle of Pines, which proved handily that Communists didn't want to liberate gay people.
+
There were other organizations, not Communist-influenced, that took stances and adopted tactics not shared by the group I founded two months before Stonewall, Homosexuals Intransigent!. In NY, Gay Activists Alliance staged demonstrations and sit-ins at, for instance, the offices of publications that issued antihomosexual materials. I did not participate in such things, only in the first several marches each June to commemorate the Stonewall Riots. My worst enemies, however, were always the people who tried to confuse gay men and make them identify with and lend their legitimacy and power to people unlike us, especially lesbians, so-called "bisexuals", and what came to be called the mythical "transgendered" people. You see, I and my organization rejected all suggestions that gay men must identify as women or confused losers and cowards who refused to 'fess up to their homosexual reality. It was obvious to me that gay men needed to demand respect for their MANHOOD, and their right to be men oriented to and concerned primarily with, men. Let lesbians take care of lesbians, not parasitize gay men's organizations and misdirect gay men's numbers and money away from men's concerns to, instead, women's issues, and esp. that most heterosexual of women's issues, murder of the unborn, which would, statistically, mean the murder of more boys than girls, because more boys are conceived. I knew full well that that was not just NOT a gay-men's issue but actually murderously antagonistic to gay boys.
+
Rather than argue the merits of particular issues — for instance, whether "bisexuals" are just, shall we say, 'homos in hiding', and "transgendered" people don't have the courage to be openly gay, so pretend to be women so they can "properly" lust after men — these enemies have worked to prevent me from receiving any recognition by society, for instance, being credited in Wikipedia as coiner of "Gay Pride". I think they keep waiting for me to die so they can rewrite history and erase all evidence that I or my stances ever existed. But the more time that goes by, while I am still alive to speak out on a podcast or in print, the more doomed their cause. I WILL be recognized as coiner of "Gay Pride", whether they like it or not.
+
Uniting Suburban and City Gay-Pride Events. Again this year, anti-Newark activists have held a "North Jersey Pride Festival" in Maplewood, dividing the suburbs from the City. Altho the pretense is that that event is inclusive of all types of people from the entire state of New Jersey, it is plain to me that racial animus is a large part of, if not THE primary motivation, behind this suburban event. Disgraceful. Newarkers, fortunately, have not given up their own Pride events, but will again this year celebrate their own Gay Pride Week next month, including a "Sounds of the City" dance party outside NJPAC on Tuesday, July 16th from 5-6pm. When will the "lesbigay" community end the racial segregation in Essex County "Gay Pride" events?



Unfortunately, the gay movement in this area is as crazy and destructive as all of the groups absurdly thrown together now were in the worst, benited days of the 1950s. "Newark Gay Pride" proclaims on its website "A Celebration of Newark's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Community!" There IS NO SUCH COMMUNITY. These groups rarely get together for any reason, and most of the time have no interest in each other, or, if the truth be told, much use for each other. Gay men are not lesbians, not "bisexual", and most emphatically NOT "transgender"."Queer" is an INSULT that cannot be rehabilitated. It will remain, ALWAYS, the exact equivalent of "the N-word" WITH the R. Gay men outnumber lesbians, but are always relegated to SECOND in the various names of this nonexistent "community". Lesbians who would be indignant at men opening a door (while saying "Ladies first!") or pulling out a chair for them at a table in a restaurant have no hesitancy to sell out their Radical Feminist principles to insist that L always go before G.



It's one thing to form an alliance between groups all of which know that they are separate and distinct. It is quite another to try to force all the groups of an alliance to IDENTIFY as each other, as confuses their own identities. It is SHAMEFUL that so many gay men and lesbian women are still so CRAZY, self-denying, and self-despising after all these years. I put forward the term "Gay Pride" in spring 1970, 45 YEARS ago. What is TAKING so long for these people to sort themselves out?